Jump to content

Just confirmed on the Georgia message board!


ORabidOne

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LOSer said:

So you keep asking how you're softening the loss and then you keep doing it in the very same post.

I mean it's comical to watch you incompetent rubes at work.

First off you're making it out to be worse than it ever was...  

No one has denied that GAC lost to VC. But its not a big L. 

A small GA school lost to a Bigger CO school. 

So what? That doesnt hurt us. 

Its not like Grayson or Colquitt lost. 

It was a small 3A school. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said:

A small GA school lost to a Bigger CO school.

It was a small 3A school.

Valor's high school enrollment is about 870.

GAC's is about 750.

Not much of a difference.

Nice try.

Once again apologizing and making excuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LOSer said:

Valor's high school enrollment is about 870.

GAC's is about 750.

Not much of a difference.

Nice try.

Once again apologizing and making excuses.

About 880

To 

735ish

But whos counting.

Those #s mean little in the Private school business.

The fact is VC is in COs largest class and is the best team in Colorado every single year.

GAC is in GAs 5th largest class and ... isnt even the best team in their class for certain.

Take that for what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Can you show us this "pimping" of VC you were referring to LOS?

Valor Christian wasn't on my pimp list.

You and your butt buddy have just been apologizing for those two losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHS05 said:

Thats a rounded off #.

I gave you the real one... ~736.

Sure.

9_9

So 735.

Or around 736.

That's the "real" number.

Even though you're not sure what it is.

But you definitely the school website is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHS05 said:

 

Thats a rounded off #.

I gave you the real one... ~736.

And what's more is that you claimed that it doesn't matter.

But not before you tried to give me the number.

And say the school itself is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

You could argue about the color of grass.

Its a spectacle.

You just argued that GAC's enrollment wasn't 750 (even though the school says to).

Then you claimed that enrollment doesn't matter.

But not before you argued about it again.

The problem is that yo're just bad at it.

You suck at everything, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason Buford bought out South Pointe is plain and simple. The schools talked, Buford said they'd pay SP and SP took the money to come. I'm sure if SP said no to the offer Buford would be heading that way tomorrow.  Buford has traveled in the past to Ohio and Texas. Don't know why anyone would make a big deal about a school paying another to come, it's not like it doesn't happen every week. Anyway that's my final answer.  As always. 75

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 75son said:

The reason Buford bought out South Pointe is plain and simple. The schools talked, Buford said they'd pay SP and SP took the money to come. Don't know why anyone would make a big deal about a school paying another to come, it's not like it doesn't happen every week.

So your two reasons are not really reasons.

They're just justifications.

Which are just as lame as they are when the Florida Gators or other such weak-kneed college programs make them.

It's a sissy move.

Plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 75son said:

The reason Buford bought out South Pointe is plain and simple. The schools talked, Buford said they'd pay SP and SP took the money to come. I'm sure if SP said no to the offer Buford would be heading that way tomorrow.  Buford has traveled in the past to Ohio and Texas. Don't know why anyone would make a big deal about a school paying another to come, it's not like it doesn't happen every week. Anyway that's my final answer.  As always. 75

Obviously the finances were better for both parties. Buford says, "Hey, you can make more money if we play the game here, even after the travel cost and you won't have any overhead by hosting."

That is a no brainer for most teams. However, common sense is not common around here; so save your breath, you'll be wasting your time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CCBlackhatter said:

That is a no brainer for most teams. However, common sense is not common around here; so save your breath, you'll be wasting your time.

It's only a no-brainer if your only mission is to maximize revenue.

If you have any competitive bones in your body it's a sissy move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LOSer said:

So your two reasons are not really reasons.

They're just justifications.

Which are just as lame as they are when the Florida Gators or other such weak-kneed college programs make them.

It's a sissy move.

Plain and simple.

Really one reason money...... a sissy move would be not to play them at all. Loser you're going to have to argue with someone else. South Pointe at Buford Friday night. It is what it is, football. As always.  75

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 75son said:

Loser you're going to have to argue with someone else. 

Well, I'm not going to argue with you because you're incompetent and you don't have an answer other than Buford is all about money and not competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 75son said:

It is what it is, football. As always.

In football teams travel.

In this case I wonder why Buford doesn't just play 10 home games. If it's all about money and "common sense" then they should never play any road games, ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LOSer said:

You can stop repeating yourself.

Everybody knows it was a money grab.

The secondary reason is not wanting to risk losing.

If SP is as good as advertised playing at Buford shouldnt effect them. 

Now you sound absolutely stupid... 

Buford going to SP  wouldnt effect the competitiveness 

And vice versa. This is just a sissy ass statement by you to avoid getting embarrassed. 

75  told you what you wanted to know. 

You get on our ass for making excuses. Now you say Buford would lose if they played at SP... 

Again if SP is as good as they claim then playing at Buford wont be a problem. 

Now like he said Friday at 7PM. 

SP @  Buford.  Like it or not its at Buford.  

You give us hell for making up excuses and using homefield advantage  as a reason. 

But now you're doing it... 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...