concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: The lowest of low standards. Which is why you claiming that Thomas Sowell has such a high IQ is laughable. I bet you have no clue what it actually is. Sure I do. I'm just not telling. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, concha said: Simon Legree lying. "Tuesday" Trump had named and vetted potential candidates in advance and very publicly well before any seats on SCOTUS became available. Brandon sold a seat for a race-based favor to win an election, and then went hunting for potential candidates later. Facts. That chap Simon Legree's ass. just like Reagan did?....and Trump did vet anyone....he just looked at his list....🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 hour ago, DBP66 said: just like Reagan did?....and Trump did vet anyone....he just looked at his list....🤡 concha knows that he's flailing. He had totally forgot about Trump doing this in 2020. He took a one day sabbatical to figure out his next toady move. He returned with "Trump released a list therefore it was *not* what it seemed!" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: concha knows that he's flailing. He had totally forgot about Trump doing this in 2020. He took a one day sabbatical to figure out his next toady move. He returned with "Trump released a list therefore it was *not* what it seemed!" Poor Simon Legree. Trump had publicly released his potential candidates long before. Brandon sold the seat (and a job for a pol's daughter) for a race-based endorsement. Facts. That chap Andy's ass. 🤣 Dance, Andy! Dance! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 Just now, concha said: Poor Simon Legree. Trump had publicly released his potential candidates long before. Brandon sold the seat (and a job for a pol's daughter) for a race-based endorsement. Facts. That chap Andy's ass. 🤣 Dance, Andy! Dance! where did you hear this crazy idea "he sold the seat to a pol's daughter"?!..LOL.....Rogan?...Hannity?....Carlson?...Rudy?...Sidney?....who spilled the beans?....🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 minute ago, DBP66 said: where did you hear this crazy idea "he sold the seat to a pol's daughter"?!..LOL.....Rogan?...Hannity?....Carlson?...Rudy?...Sidney?....who spilled the beans?....🤡 Clyburn's daughter. Look it up, dumbass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, concha said: Clyburn's daughter. Look it up, dumbass. LOL....it's a done deal huh?...let's see....LOL...🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 hour ago, concha said: Trump had publicly released his potential candidates long before. This has nothing to do with anything. It's completely meaningless as a matter of fact. Trump said he was picking a woman the day after Ginsburg died. There was no process to pick anybody other than a woman. For you to pretend that it's different and feign outrage at Biden's pick is pathetic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 hour ago, DBP66 said: where did you hear this crazy idea "he sold the seat to a pol's daughter"?!.. He didn't. He's just repeating his toady talking points. He was legitimately shook when Trump's quote came out. He looked like a complete dumbass. This is the best he could do. Talk about some list as if it changes the lack of process at all. It's a complete red herring. Biden could've had a list behind the scenes and it would do nothing to change the fact that he said he would nominate a black woman. Just like it does nothing to absolve Trump of his sexist process. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 12 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: This has nothing to do with anything. It's completely meaningless as a matter of fact. Trump said he was picking a woman the day after Ginsburg died. There was no process to pick anybody other than a woman. For you to pretend that it's different and feign outrage at Biden's pick is pathetic. Women were already included on the list of candidates he had publicly provided beforehand without selling a SCOTUS seat and a federal job for political favor. The ass-kicking continues as long as you want to continue receiving it, Simon Legree. 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, concha said: Women were already included on the list of candidates he had publicly provided beforehand without selling a SCOTUS seat and a federal job for political favor. The ass-kicking continues as long as you want to continue receiving it, Simon Legree. 🤣 he didn't sell anything....it's in your imagination.....🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 18 minutes ago, DBP66 said: he didn't sell anything....it's in your imagination.....🤡 🤣 It was literally all over even the mainstream media. Clyburn demanded. Biden announced it in a debate. Clyburn's endorsement came the very next day. And then Clyburn's daughter magically got a federal gig. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 40 minutes ago, concha said: Women were already included on the list of candidates he had publicly provided beforehand So what? This is a pathetic dodge. The existence of a list does nothing to absolve the sexist part of the process. It says a lot that this is the best that you can come up with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 Just now, Atticus Finch said: So what? This is a pathetic dodge. The existence of a list does nothing to absolve the sexist part of the process. It says a lot that this is the best that you can come up with. His list of acceptable and supportable candidates were not chosen on a sexist (or race-based) basis and were chosen from potential candidates of all sexes and colors. That he chose a woman at that point is much ado about nothing. Brandon, on the other hand, went sex and race-based from the get go. 94% of the America excluded immediately. In order to pay a political debt. The whole country knows this. And Simon Legree HATES it. 🤬 The two situations are galactically different. And it chaps your ass. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 1 minute ago, concha said: His list of acceptable and supportable candidates were not chosen on a sexist (or race-based) basis and were chosen from potential candidates of all sexes and colors. He chose Amy Coney Barrett because she was a woman. Period. Full stop. No amount of squirming from you is going to change that. We saw how flummoxed you were by Trump's quote. We know that you're scrambling like a good toady to explain this away. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, concha said: That he chose a woman at that point is much ado about nothing. Before being confronted with Trump's quote, it was sexist. 👇 On 1/30/2022 at 10:48 AM, concha said: 3) Making race and sex components of the selection process is racist and sexist. Now? It's much ado about nothing. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 5 minutes ago, concha said: The two situations are galactically different. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 Revel in the change of tone that concha experienced when he thought he would have free reign to fail on Biden's "racist" and "sexist" process only to walk into a rake after Trump's quote surfaced. 👇 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 Andy's dancing and dodging is so hilariously obvious I actually feel sorry him. It sucks when your guy goes gender and race to buy an endorsement before ever looking at candidates. Andy is SOOOOOO pissed and desperate. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 3 hours ago, concha said: 🤣 It was literally all over even the mainstream media. Clyburn demanded. Biden announced it in a debate. Clyburn's endorsement came the very next day. And then Clyburn's daughter magically got a federal gig. 🤣 federal gig??...LOL...what happened to the S.C. spot that we were talking about?...and was she qualified for the job she got? or just the fact that she is black bother you?....🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 hours ago, concha said: His list of acceptable and supportable candidates were not chosen on a sexist (or race-based) basis and were chosen from potential candidates of all sexes and colors. That he chose a woman at that point is much ado about nothing. Brandon, on the other hand, went sex and race-based from the get go. 94% of the America excluded immediately. In order to pay a political debt. The whole country knows this. And Simon Legree HATES it. 🤬 The two situations are galactically different. And it chaps your ass. 🤣 the "list" he had no part in making?..LOL...please stop with the "list" that was spoon fed to him...it's embarrassing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 hours ago, concha said: Andy's dancing and dodging is so hilariously obvious I actually feel sorry him. It sucks when your guy goes gender and race to buy an endorsement before ever looking at candidates. Andy is SOOOOOO pissed and desperate. just like Reagan did...🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.