concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said: Again, you can use the search function to see all the times concha has been left with egg on his face. Just a note: concha *hates* the search function with a passion. It's funny when Andy thinks he's doing well and all he is doing is advertising to everyone that he is a liar who can't perform grade school math. 🤡 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, concha said: 5.6% as a starting point is ANDY's arbitrary starting point. Not mine. 🤣 An Andy lie. You said "well over a year." I picked a conservative time frame for what constitutes "well over" a year. A year itself is an arbitrary number that you picked to serve your narrative. Obama was President for 8 years and Trump was President for 4. One year is totally self-serving and obviously misleading given the 18-month number and basically any number longer than that. These are the things that make you a liar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 9 minutes ago, concha said: 62.8% to 63.3% IS an increase you complete buffoon. 🤡 You call this a lie? So we have yet ANOTHER Andy lie. It's a weasel phrase as I mentioned. 5.6% to 4.7% is "not a material decline" but 62.8% to 63.3% is "INCREASING" in ALL CAPS. You do this *all* the time. You lie, manipulate, misonstrue, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 11 minutes ago, concha said: Why did Andy pick the arbitrary date of May 2015 to start? Because that's "well over a year." It's no more arbitrary than one year. concha is just mad that I use his words and still beat him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said: It was 4.7% and it had dropped 0.9% in 18 months. 1) 18 months is not a year. So you've done nothing to refute me. 🤡 LMAO 2) Obama's final month in office was January 2017. To demonstrate a 0.9% decline you have to go back to May of 2015. So let's do the simple math that Andy is too fucking stupid to handle: June-December 2015 = 7 months 2016 = 12 months January 2017 =1 month That's 20 months. Using Andy Math, it's 18. 🤡 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: You said "well over a year." I picked a conservative time frame for what constitutes "well over" a year. A year itself is an arbitrary number that you picked to serve your narrative. Obama was President for 8 years and Trump was President for 4. One year is totally self-serving and obviously misleading given the 18-month number and basically any number longer than that. These are the things that make you a liar. YOU picked the first number that showed up that you could possibly make a case for. 🤡 16 months is well over a year. And you didn't even use 18 months. You couldn't even figure out what month 18 months fell on. LMAO 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 14 minutes ago, concha said: Because if you go back in time from Trump's inauguration, it is the first month Andy can use to show anything like a material decline under Obama. 🤣 This is obviously false. I could use January 2015 (5.7%) or July 2015 (5.2%). Almost any time period more than a year works to prove that there was an existing trend. What's funny is that in trying to claim cherry-picking you expose yourself as the cherry-picker. Why does concha use a year? Because he's lying to you. He wants to claim that there wasn't an existing downward trend so he picks an arbitrary number (nobody of any character would pick a year for an 8-year President transitioning to a 4-year President) to purposefully make it come right for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 18 minutes ago, concha said: When Trump took over (January 2016), it was 4.8%. It was 4.7%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 19 minutes ago, concha said: When Trump took over (January 2016), Trump took over in January 2017. This guy. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 23 minutes ago, concha said: When Trump took over (January 2016), it was 4.8%. Over his final SIXTEEN months, Obama delivered a drop in unemployment of 0.2%. Now he uses 16 months. The guy is so fucking dishonest. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, concha said: I never agreed. Not once. People can judge for themselves. Hint: you did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, concha said: I'm stating facts. You can keep repeating this, lie bot, but it doesn't make it true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: It's a weasel phrase as I mentioned. 5.6% to 4.7% is "not a material decline" but 62.8% to 63.3% is "INCREASING" in ALL CAPS. You do this *all* the time. You lie, manipulate, misonstrue, etc. LMAO!!!!! I never addressed YOUR timeframe. In fact, YOU didn't even get your 18-month timeframe correct, you buffoon. 🤡 And 63.3% > 62.8%. This is priceless. 1) You change the timeframe, act like it's mine and call me liar about it. What a dishonest turd. 2) Then, you don't even get YOUR OWN timeframe correct. Hilarious. 🤣 3) The then you act like 63.3% is not an increase from 62.8%. Your dishonestly and stupidity know no bounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, concha said: Your worthless opinion. My opinion against the opinion of a paid shill. And agreed to by you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 17 minutes ago, concha said: It did not materially decline. It did. You cherry-picked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 11 minutes ago, concha said: 1) 18 months is not a year. So you've done nothing to refute me. 🤡 LMAO You didn't say a year. You said "well over a year." Then you tried 16 months. Anything to skew the facts and sell your narrative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 12 minutes ago, concha said: 2) Obama's final month in office was January 2017. To demonstrate a 0.9% decline you have to go back to May of 2015. Which is "well over a year." But use January 2015 (which is an even two years) or July 2015. Still a material decline. You're lying as usual and are now trying to save face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 10 minutes ago, concha said: YOU picked the first number that showed up that you could possibly make a case for. Again, as I already said, you can use July 2015 (which is what I originally meant to) and it still refutes your lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 12 minutes ago, concha said: 16 months is well over a year. So is 18, or 20 or 2 years. They all show a material decline in the unemployment rate. You are arguing semantics as usual because *your* claims are such obvious lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 8 minutes ago, concha said: LMAO!!!!! I never addressed YOUR timeframe. In fact, YOU didn't even get your 18-month timeframe correct, you buffoon. 🤡 I have. You're just too busy trying to change the subject and flail around. 👇 14 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: This is obviously false. I could use January 2015 (5.7%) or July 2015 (5.2%). Almost any time period more than a year works to prove that there was an existing trend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 9 minutes ago, concha said: 1) You change the timeframe, act like it's mine and call me liar about it. What a dishonest turd. No, I used your words against you to prove that you're lying about the numbers. As usual. July 2015 (5.2%) to January 2017 (4.7%). 0.5% A material decline. An existing trend. concha will continue to flail and post emojis to ignore the *material* fact that he's lying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 11 minutes ago, concha said: 2) Then, you don't even get YOUR OWN timeframe correct. Hilarious. 🤣 I acknowledged the brain fart and made the correction. What's really funny is that it doesn't chance the *material* facts. You're lying. It must hurt real bad to not be able to take advantage of my goof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: This is obviously false. I could use January 2015 (5.7%) or July 2015 (5.2%). Almost any time period more than a year works to prove that there was an existing trend. What's funny is that in trying to claim cherry-picking you expose yourself as the cherry-picker. Why does concha use a year? Because he's lying to you. He wants to claim that there wasn't an existing downward trend so he picks an arbitrary number (nobody of any character would pick a year for an 8-year President transitioning to a 4-year President) to purposefully make it come right for him. I am crying laughing. If you use July of 2015 (you appear to be admitting to your mathematical buffoonery here) until Trump took over, the average monthly decline under Obama was 0.0287% per month. Under Trump it was double that. And - wait for it - we ANOTHER Andy lie. I never said there was no reduction. I said it had hardly moved, which is absolutely true. You basically got a 0.1% drop every 5 months or so over a 16-month period. Andy wants you to believe that pointing to 15 or 16 straight months of hardly noticeable movement in unemployment is dishonest. What a dishonest buffoon. Remember, Andy is the guy who can't figure out how long 18 months is. 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 18 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Now he uses 16 months. The guy is fucking dishonest. 😄 What is dishonest, Andy? 🤣 Either timeframe gives the same result. How embarrassing for you being exposed as a math illiterate. 🤡 Talk about "flailing". 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 17 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: My opinion against the opinion of a paid shill. And agreed to by you. As opposed to a low wage self-appointed shill (that's you). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.