aZjimbo Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 hour ago, thc6795 said: Yep a crazed libtard went hunting Republicans and it is all President Trumps fault. The mindset of liberals is beyond reproach. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 Who says the shooter would have just walked away if the answer he got was that there was democrats on the field? No one can say he wouldn't have still fired on them. Was he screaming "DEMOCRATS RULE! REPUBLICANS DIE!!!" as he opened fire? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: Who says the shooter would have just walked away if the answer he got was that there was democrats on the field? No one can say he wouldn't have still fired on them. Was he screaming "DEMOCRATS RULE! REPUBLICANS DIE!!!" as he opened fire? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, zulu1128 said: So it's ok if the republicans declare this guy a whacko dem with no proof but not ok for democrats to declare Trump a whacko Russian collaborater? I see how this works now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxchoboian Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 hour ago, thc6795 said: By noon the media will have this all blamed on President Trump. 19 minutes ago, thc6795 said: Im positive you will honor him. Someone is in too deep with these political threads. Needs a break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 17 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: What, what just happened? Did someone get ruffled? I don't expect you to answer to me but you can't escape God. He will enquire. Understood? Lol at you religious nutcases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: Just the facts. "Facts" (if you can even say that) that are of a thought more antiquated than the electoral college you are bitching about. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 42 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: Does not matter where the votes came from as long as they were legal. Are you listening? The Electoral College vote stems from an idea that the more land or bigger the territory, the more clout. An out-dated system that does not take into account how many residents are included in those areas. As of today, laws are written because Utah, with 1/3 the population of, lets say Georgia, for arguments sake, needs something that is no problem in Georgia. The insurance fight is the perfect example. We have no problems with not having carriers. There are plenty of companies doing business in Georgia and you have a choice. Utah has none. Why must Georgia endure the bull that comes with laws changing to accommodate that 1/3 in Utah? Methinks you don't understand the Electoral College. It is NOT based on land, it is TOTALLY based on representatives in Congress. One for each Senator and one for each member of the House. I guess to the extent senators are not based on population there is so very small argument there but it does not matter the land mass even with those. The numbers based on the House are totally determined based on population. No where is it based on the more land or bigger the territory. By the way, you are also wrong about the number of insurance carriers in GA. 90 something rural counties have only one carrier and it is a high cost low benefit policy. In the Metro area there are multiple carriers to be sure but GA is considered an under insured state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, Fred said: Methinks you don't understand the Electoral College. It is NOT based on land, it is TOTALLY based on representatives in Congress. One for each Senator and one for each member of the House. I guess to the extent senators are not based on population there is so very small argument there but it does not matter the land mass even with those. The numbers based on the House are totally determined based on population. No where is it based on the more land or bigger the territory. By the way, you are also wrong about the number of insurance carriers in GA. 90 something rural counties have only one carrier and it is a high cost low benefit policy. In the Metro area there are multiple carriers to be sure but GA is considered an under insured state. I was in the process of typing this same thing. Thanks for saving me the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 Its also funny that the electoral college only comes under attack when a Democrat loses the electoral vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 34 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: So it's ok if the republicans declare this guy a whacko dem with no proof but not ok for democrats to declare Trump a whacko Russian collaborater? I see how this works now. Well, I won't presume to speak to the "whacko" part. That said, there's plenty of proof that he was a leftist who hated Trump, and asked "if those were democrats or republicans" on the field before shooting. Your analogy falls a little flat, since there is at least some evidence on one front, and none on the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 The Democrats have 1/3 of the needed electoral votes in the bag regardless. (CA and NY) Seems like a pretty hefty advantage out of the gate to me. Add in the other snowflake west coast states and the Democrats losing any election is inexcuseable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 Another shooting in San Francisco President Trump has been busy today. Maybe Russia will invade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiberalDonaldTrump Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 I heard the pizza shop in DC hired this hit man to take out the republicans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan in daytona Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 hour ago, 181pl said: Educate yourself on the electoral college and its history. The election was a blowout for Trump. Hillary had a slight popular vote edge because the 6+ million more votes she got it brainwashed California. Thanks. Oh, so now the " one person, one vote " is no longer the American ideal ? We pick and choose what segment of the population is irrelevant and then exclude them ? If we're going to play that game I'll start by throwing out all the clueless lemmings who bought Trump's tough guy persona. Tampa area.....you're the first to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aZjimbo Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 55 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: So it's ok if the republicans declare this guy a whacko dem with no proof but not ok for democrats to declare Trump a whacko Russian collaborater? I see how this works now. Seriously? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: God does not go out of style neither does he erode of vanish. I am a believer That's well documented my easily brainwashed friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 12 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: and that number was in direct correlation to the amount of land. What number is directly correlated to the the amount of land? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: and that number was in direct correlation to the amount of land. Each state gets two Senators regardless of population. The number of Representatives is based on population, not land. This is elementary civics dude. Go research the "Great Comprimise". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: Your previous post says that the thought is antiquated and you suggest it is not fact. Make up your mind. Thoughts do not equate to facts. Your thoughts and much of what you say are evident of that. Wowzers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Sportsnut said: Colquitt is the capital of Tifton. Now you get it. Thats a good start. Just like a bunch old dead bastards' writings in a book do constitute fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 2 hours ago, LiberalDonaldTrump said: Is that considered terrorism? It is not. The shooter wasn't Muslim. Rufus>> 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCBlackhatter Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Rufus69 said: It is not. The shooter wasn't Muslim. Rufus>> True. (Not really) This is certainly a case of mental illness (Liberalism) ☺ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Sportsnut said: Dig a little deeper. I don't need to. I understand the Electoral College. It is you that is suspect. Now if you are obliquely referring to the 3/5 compromise, that *still* has nothing to do with larger states having more votes. It just isn't true. The Electoral College is totally based on population, not state physical size. If that were the case, Alaska, Texas and California would rule the US and that's not the way it works...and you know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted June 14, 2017 Report Share Posted June 14, 2017 32 minutes ago, thc6795 said: Another shooting in San Francisco President Trump has been busy today. Maybe Russia will invade? They already have..... Rufus>> 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.