The Guru Posted May 13, 2020 Report Share Posted May 13, 2020 The Republican deflection and feces-throwing campaign is in full gear. No telling what they fake scandal they'll cook up next. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 13 hours ago, The Guru said: The Republican deflection and feces-throwing campaign is in full gear. No telling what they fake scandal they'll cook up next. Yes...now think on this... Q) the only "collusion" so far PROVEN...... ....by all these investigations ? 🤔 A)___________________________________ Have 💩 fun 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/ending-the-flynn-false-statement-case-was-the-right-judgment/ A good read. And moreso given the increasing amount of evidence showing the politics behind the witch hunt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 54 minutes ago, concha said: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/ending-the-flynn-false-statement-case-was-the-right-judgment/ A good read. And moreso given the increasing amount of evidence showing the politics behind the witch hunt. So basically.... It was objectively a crime but it should've been subjectively dropped. Yea, we know that's what happened. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 59 minutes ago, concha said: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/ending-the-flynn-false-statement-case-was-the-right-judgment/ A good read. And moreso given the increasing amount of evidence showing the politics behind the witch hunt. yea...they "tricked" him into lying?!?...LOL...how f*in sad.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, The Guru said: So basically.... It was objectively a crime but it should've been subjectively dropped. Yea, we know that's what happened. So basically he shouldn't be held to a standard that people on the other side of the aisle have not been held to. And the list is rather long and getting longer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Just now, concha said: So basically he shouldn't be held to a standard that people on the other side of the aisle have not been held to. And the list is rather long and getting longer. so two wrongs make a right??...my how low we've lowered the Barr in America.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Just now, concha said: So basically he shouldn't be held to a standard that people on the other side of the aisle have not been held to. And the list is rather long and getting longer. He was offered a plea, like anybody would, in exchange for his cooperation. Standard practice. And Barr did not make the argument that you're making. This is what I mean by fake scandal and feces-throwing. You just make shit up as you go along to justify your political needs and policy wants. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Just now, DBP66 said: so two wrongs make a right??...my how low we've lowered the Barr in America.... He's lying again. This argument hasn't been made by anybody who actually touched the case. Barr and others tried to make a legal and/or material argument. Not a subjective "judgment" argument that the National Review article made. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Just now, The Guru said: He's lying again. This argument hasn't been made by anybody who actually touched the case. Barr and others tried to make a legal and/or material argument. Not a subjective "judgment" argument that the National Review article made. I know anyone in their right mind wouldn't make that kind of argument...that's a Fox news argument. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 24 minutes ago, The Guru said: He was offered a plea, like anybody would, in exchange for his cooperation. Standard practice. And Barr did not make the argument that you're making. This is what I mean by fake scandal and feces-throwing. You just make shit up as you go along to justify your political needs and policy wants. 1) Dems have lied and no pleas offered. Why? Different standards. 2) So what if Barr is making a different point? So then there are multiple reasons. Great. Enjoy your outrage. We certainly are. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 The dems accussing the right of deflection....priceless! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Looking like former US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch may have perjured herself. But we know she is part of the favored class, just like Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Perez, Clinton, Comey... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: Looking like former US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch may have perjured herself. But we know she is part of the favored class, just like Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Perez, Clinton, Comey... aka "the deep state" ^...LOL... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 36 minutes ago, concha said: 1) Dems have lied and no pleas offered. Why? Different standards. Huh? Pleas are actually beneficial to the subject. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 37 minutes ago, concha said: 2) So what if Barr is making a different point? Simple. There's not actually any reason to drop the charges other than political corruption. When there are multiple parties making multiple arguments regarding a simple case where the subject plead guilty then there isn't a single good point. It's a free-for-all to cover their ass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 23 minutes ago, DBP66 said: aka "the deep state" ^...LOL... These people are loons. They are rife with criminals and their only recourse is to investigate the investigations and convince dumb and/or ignorant people that normal police procedure is corrupt. They cry foul about "procedure" and then their entire argument is to basically manufacture nitpicks regarding procedure. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 35 minutes ago, concha said: Looking like former US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch may have perjured herself. This is how every fake right-wing manufactured scandal starts. "Looks like (insert person who testified against corrupt Republican) may have perjured herself!" Just like Vindman "admitted to lying" about his summary. Some young Republican lacky was locked into a room for weeks and told not to exit until he/she found an obscure note or talking point that could be lied about and exploited for political purposes. concha is their mark. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Guru said: Huh? Pleas are actually beneficial to the subject. Pleas typically require an indictment or formal accusation. Certain people have lied with zero legal consequences. Undeniable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, concha said: Pleas typically require an indictment or formal accusation. He was going to be formally charged with the crime he committed prior to the January 24th meeting. Then he lied again. He was impeding the investigation. They offered him a deal and he plead guilty to the crime that he obviously committed. There's no "there" there. This is so standard that it's boring and tedious. When Republicans need cover for their political corruption they call in their top toadies like concha to carry their water. This is embarrassing even for someone like him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Guru said: This is how every fake right-wing manufactured scandal starts. "Looks like (insert person who testified against corrupt Republican) may have perjured herself!" Just like Vindman "admitted to lying" about his summary. Some young Republican lacky was locked into a room for weeks and told not to exit until he/she found an obscure note or talking point that could be lied about and exploited for political purposes. concha is their mark. "May" is what responsible people say as they await more data and confirmation (about the alleged direct correspondence and meetings with Burisma). Noted how quick you are to jump to dismiss the very notion that this may be true. You even make up a little back story and throw in "obscure". Basis? Your ass. Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Perez, Clinton, Comey... all proven liars. But Andy just ignores the lies and the fact that THEIR lies are magically not pursued legally. "Approved result for me but not for thee" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: "May" is what responsible people say as they await more data and confirmation (about the alleged direct correspondence and meetings with Burisma). The word may in this instance is like Fox News' "some people say" line. It allows you to put an allegation out there that is politically beneficial but likely has practically zero truth to it. Hunter Biden and Burisma are in the Republican fake scandal cross-hairs because Joe Biden is running against Trump and is ahead in practically every poll. Everybody knows this, concha. You don't have to be a toady every waking second of your life. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: Noted how quick you are to jump to dismiss the very notion that this may be true. You even make up a little back story and throw in "obscure". Basis? Your ass. You provided no source and certainly no evidence. Which is par for the course for pretty much every accusation made against people who testify against Trump. Hmm. Interesting. Almost every single person who testifies to factually true claims against Trump is meticulously investigated by Trump's cronies and "may" have done something or the other. This is shocking to pretty much nobody. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, concha said: Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Perez, Clinton, Comey... all proven liars. "I know that Flynn, et al are totally guilty but....(insert something about non-criminals not being prosecuted)!" 🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Guru said: "I know that Flynn, et al are totally guilty (of things others don't get prosecuted over) but....(insert something about non-criminals not being prosecuted)!" 🤡 FIFY 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.