HooverOutlaw Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Nt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Good stuff. Where is the number 12 ranking from for McGill-Toolen? I saw #5 in the expert rankings for USAT. Is the 12 from the super25? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coletrain06 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Good for Hoover. They were a pretty classy bunch when we played them in 07. I like Hoover, not scared to play anybody either. That said, I've seen much better Hoover teams. This is probably a top 50 team. McGill is not a top 100 team IMO. They'd get slaughtered by Iggy, Colerain, and Wayne. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfaddict1 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, HawgGoneIt said: Good stuff. Where is the number 12 ranking from for McGill-Toolen? I saw #5 in the expert rankings for USAT. Is the 12 from the super25? Perhaps polls should be private I think we we did a pretty good job of avoiding some marshmallow schools. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 6 hours ago, golfaddict1 said: Perhaps polls should be private I think we we did a pretty good job of avoiding some marshmallow schools. I mentioned that before in the game thread. We moved away from Mallard Creek and McGill-Toolen both like they had the plague. Never could see the same things in them the other polls did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 I turned it off in the 2nd quarter. Not impressed either way. SO. Hoover beats a team 99.9% of the forum says is/was a fraud 17-7. It was Hoover's biggest win this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 8 hours ago, Coletrain06 said: That said, I've seen much better Hoover teams. This is probably a top 50 team. McGill is not a top 100 team IMO. They'd get slaughtered by Iggy, Colerain, and Wayne. So a probable top 50 team beat a non-top 100 team 17-7? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 34 minutes ago, LOSer said: So a probable top 50 team beat a non-top 100 team 17-7? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Just now, ECHS05 said: Yes. So no, then. Not a top 50 team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nptb17 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Hoover's defense is solid. You have to have a solid offensive line or you'll get exposed like McGill did last night. I watched about 12 teams last weekend that would feast on McGill offensive simply because their coaches make no adjustments and they are a soft team overall. I would say Hoover is a top 100 squad in the back half of the 50. Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, LOSer said: So a probable top 50 team beat a non-top 100 team 17-7? Here we go.... (Insert Hoover sucks because Los ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Just now, TheMaximumHornetSting said: Here we go.... (Insert Hoover sucks because Los ) Hoover sucks because I prove it with facts? And this annoys you. Typical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 Just now, LOSer said: Hoover sucks because I prove it with facts? And this annoys you. Typical. Facts? where is the fact that they suck. Hoover may not be a top 25 team I'll agree and top 50 is up for debate. But they dont suck. a sucky team doesnt win a state championship. Is it because they have 2 losses to top 25 teams? You know who else has 2 losses ? One to a non-top 25 team? I shouldnt have to say it. I guess they suck too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 3 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: Facts? where is the fact that they suck. I posted that a (in his words) probable top 50 team had beaten a (in his words) not top 100 team, 17-7. If you think top 50 national teams beat non top 100 teams 17-7 on a regular basis (like Hoover does) then so be it. You'd be wrong but you're entitled to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 3 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: a sucky team doesnt win a state championship. Proving what we all suspected. You know nothing about high school football. There are tons of sucky state champions every year in this country. Wake up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 2 hours ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: Is it because they have 2 losses to top 25 teams? You know who else has 2 losses ? They have two losses by 3 scores each. Then they have wins like this... 23-7, 14-7, 26-8, 31-10, 19-3, 20-0 This is a constant with Hoover. No matter the year. This is who they are, People who understand high school football slot them properly. Those who don't overrate them on a yearly basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coletrain06 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 5 hours ago, LOSer said: So a probable top 50 team beat a non-top 100 team 17-7? I don't really know exactly where they should be because I haven't gone through and tried to make a top 100, hence the word "probably", Could be 75, could be 50. Not a whole lot of difference in that range. MOV is a poor judging factor. Some teams are very strong defensively and not very strong on offense. They aren't built to blow teams out. Hoover is one of those teams. They are very good on defense and not very good on offense. Also if you watched the game, McGill had pretty much zero hope of scoring. Hoover must have had near 10 sacks and 17 tackles for losses. Hoover just sat on the lead in the 2nd half and burned the clock. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, LOSer said: They have to two losses by 3 scores each. Then they have wins like this... 23-7, 14-7, 26-8, 31-10, 19-3, 20-0 This is a constant with Hoover. No matter the year. This is who they are, People who understand high school football slot them properly. Those who don't overrate them on a yearly basis. Some of this is bc of offense... yet the defense remains good enough to beat many other teams. MoV doesnt decide much at all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Coletrain06 said: MOV is a poor judging factor. Tuning you out now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, ECHS05 said: Some of this is bc of offense... So basically 1/3 of their team stinks? And you think they should be top 50? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, ECHS05 said: MoV doesnt decide much at all. The stupid here is so thick. Good lord. The amount of stupidity that is posted here on a daily basis is incredible. And these are people who follow high school football closely. Imagine the rest of the country who supposedly knows less than you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 3 hours ago, LOSer said: Hoover sucks because I prove it with facts? And this annoys you. Typical. Facts? where is the fact that they suck. Hoover may not be a top 25 team I'll agree and top 50 is up for debate. But they dont suck. a sucky team doesnt win a state championship. Is it because they have 2 losses to top 25 teams? You know who else has 2 losses ? One to a non-top 25 team? I shouldnt have to say it. I guess they suck too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 3 hours ago, LOSer said: Proving what we all suspected. You know nothing about high school football. There are tons of sucky state champions every year in this country. Wake up. "Proving what we all suspected" there you go with that Broad ass paintbrush. I know I dont know everything about Football never claimed I did. Matter a fact I didnt prove anything I gave an Opinion so there is no right or wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 I still wanna know who this we is. nobody is talking but me and you on this. what are you a legion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LOSer Posted December 1, 2016 Report Share Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: Matter a fact I didnt prove anything I gave an Opinion so there is no right or wrong. You gave an incredibly ignorant and naive opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.