thc6795 Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, noonereal said: That was just asinine for him to say. like Trump or not, there is no denying he is a disaster to date God forbid we have a true crisis, there is no one I'd rather not have in charge. This is a true coup for Putin. Go PUTIN. I hope his first targets are libs and snowflakes. Maybe he should treat libs and snowflakes like Extreme Muslims treat Christians. It wont be all that bad, will it. Lets hear it for world order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 hour ago, TheRealCAJ said: concha, wakes up for one reason only. To play the addictive game of "Reps vs Dems". A real junkie. If he can go to sleep each night thinking he has a couple of GOP Wins for the day he sleeps like a crack head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, thc6795 said: Go PUTIN. I hope his first targets are libs and snowflakes. Maybe he should treat libs and snowflakes like Extreme Muslims treat Christians. It wont be all that bad, will it. Lets hear it for world order. Well, I do agree. Putin would be quick to target those on the left as the right are much more aligned with him philosophically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 hours ago, DBP66 said: ...maybe one party represents people who have money to give to political parties??... (which promises-and gives them tax cuts..their number one reason for voting and being a Republican in the first place).... from a guy who seems to do nothing but site economic factors it's surprising you can't figure this one out...the old stero-type is true...the republican party is of and for the rich...who do you think the 5,000 or so families who would be effected by the Inheitance tax (aka the DEATH tax...thanks to republican branding) vote for?? and give money to??...the party that will save them money...voting with their pocketbook...hope this helps you two figure things out.... look at who supported Bernie Sanders and the average amount of money they contributed to him and then take a look at Donny's donors.... The wonderful party you slobber over conspired to screw over Bernie. The one they chose to run for president is a darling of Wall Street who along with her husband ran a sleazy pay-for-play operation that netted them untold millions. BTW, you do know that the Russians were involved in the pay-for-play, right? Right, DBP? You aren't ignorant of that fact, correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 Just now, noonereal said: Well, I do agree. Putin would be quick to target those on the left as the right are much more aligned with him philosophically. Looks like Im ok then. Trump/Putin ticket for 2020. Still better then anything the Dems have to offer. Chuck/Nancy vs Trump/Putin 2020. Id take my chances with Trutin all day long over those 2 clowns. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 hours ago, noonereal said: The RNC kicking the heck out of the DNC in fundraising is not proof that the GOP base is not shrinking. That is faulty logic. Hence nothing for DBP66 to reconcile. This kind of false statement that directs the conversation is why I don't reply to much of your banter. I hope other stop also and simply call you out as I just did. But Fox News' place in the ratings is an indicator? Is it? Or is it a combination of Fox losing its biggest ratings draws, its start to move over to the left as the Murdoch sons take control, and viwerhip increases at the likes of MSNBC as folks like Chip and DBP tune in every night for their dose of "anonymous sources report <<fill in blank about about Russia>>" while ignoring the fact there is no actual, real bona fide evidence that has been found? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 Why is anyone be talking about Hillary at all? Never mind that someone, Dem or not would defend her. She is universally condemned. Move on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 Just now, noonereal said: Why is anyone be talking about Hillary at all? Never mind that someone, Dem or not would defend her. She is universally condemned. Move on. "Universally condemned"? She was the presidential candidate for one of our two major parties just months ago. She actually came out ahead in the popular vote. How frigging "universal" is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, concha said: But Fox News' place in the ratings is an indicator? my post spoke to the error in your logic you cannot make the assumption you made from the info you posted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 minute ago, concha said: "Universally condemned"? She was the presidential candidate for one of our two major parties just months ago. She actually came out ahead in the popular vote. How frigging "universal" is that? who is it that is applauding her valor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 Just now, noonereal said: my post spoke to the error in your logic you cannot make the assumption you made from the info you posted I asked a question. Do you know the difference between a question and an assertion, Nooner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 Just now, noonereal said: who is it that is applauding her valor? Nooner starts dancing. Now "universally condemned" is measured by how many "applaud" her or not. LMAO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 minute ago, concha said: I asked a question. Do you know the difference between a question and an assertion, Nooner? I will not allow you to redirect the conversation. How could you possible not understand that by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealCAJ Posted May 23, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 concha, trying to get his fix early this morning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, concha said: Nooner starts dancing. Now "universally condemned" is measured by how many "applaud" her or not. LMAO. You cannot appoint me a Hillary defender. It's a good thing you never went into law, you would be slaughter in a courtroom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, noonereal said: I will not allow you to redirect the conversation. How could you possible not understand that by now. Duck, dodge, bob and weave - and not very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, noonereal said: You cannot appoint me a Hillary defender. It's a good thing you never went into law, you would be slaughter in a courtroom. Man, the irony meters are exploding this morning. Perry "Nooner" Mason equates universal condemnation with applause levels and can't figure out how to spell "slaughtered", but I guess he'd be a monster in court. Clown. LMAO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 6 minutes ago, concha said: Man, the irony meters are exploding this morning. Perry "Nooner" Mason equates universal condemnation with applause levels and can't figure out how to spell "slaughtered", but I guess he'd be a monster in court. Clown. LMAO. good, a spelling call out finally something valid please accept my accolades Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 minute ago, noonereal said: good, a spelling call out finally something valid please accept my accolades I don't believe it was a spelling error. Remember, you are the litigator who judges universal condemnation by levels of applause. Dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, concha said: I don't believe it was a spelling error. So? lol think I am going to register "Concha Clown" in Urban dictionary. Concha clown: driven by tribal identification to the exclusion of fact. Example used in sentence: Pay no attention to what he says, he is a concha clown, not worth responding to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, noonereal said: So? lol think I am going to register "Concha Clown" in Urban dictionary. Concha clown: driven by tribal identification to the exclusion of fact. Example used in sentence: Pay no attention to what he says, he is a concha clown, not worth responding to. That's nice, Nooner. What "facts" am I excluding from the points I make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 hour ago, concha said: The wonderful party you slobber over conspired to screw over Bernie. The one they chose to run for president is a darling of Wall Street who along with her husband ran a sleazy pay-for-play operation that netted them untold millions. BTW, you do know that the Russians were involved in the pay-for-play, right? Right, DBP? You aren't ignorant of that fact, correct? nice dodge... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thc6795 Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 minute ago, DBP66 said: nice dodge... you too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 1 hour ago, concha said: But Fox News' place in the ratings is an indicator? Is it? Or is it a combination of Fox losing its biggest ratings draws, its start to move over to the left as the Murdoch sons take control, and viwerhip increases at the likes of MSNBC as folks like Chip and DBP tune in every night for their dose of "anonymous sources report <<fill in blank about about Russia>>" while ignoring the fact there is no actual, real bona fide evidence that has been found? ...how many times must I type and you read the words.."the investigation isn't completed"...so stop looking for evidence until the investigation is COMPLETED...In the meantime there are daily newspaper articles for you to be concerned about... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted May 23, 2017 Report Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, DBP66 said: nice dodge... What dodge? Hillary is a big money stooge mired in pay-for-play. But you point at Republicans? Bernie was a small money guy that your chosen party fucked over. But I'M dodging somehow? Get a grip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.