Congratulations Cedar Hill and Westlake (Austin)

[SumDude]

31 minutes ago, ECHS05 said:

Thats really not that big of a deficit for CHill. How badly was Mansfield beating them earlier this season and they came back to win? Nobody was counting CHill out.  

And now you say CHill wins due to improving in this & that... so if they dont win, well "we told yall they werent that good", but if they win its "we told yall theyd improved". Thats pretty much the line in every situation like this.

But, that would make sense wouldn't it? CHILL lost (pretty decisively) to Desoto early this season. Thus, a Desoto win is on par with the earlier performance and a CHILL win is an improvement or failure of Desoto, either of which still means CHILL moves on. What is the point of the false narrative? This scenario plays out the same in any state in any playoff system.

[steeler01]

3 hours ago, Horsefly said:

Desoto led by double digits most of the game, at HT it was 26-10 and at one point in the 3d it was 33-10.  thats not a dogfight 

watching the game chill didn't convert in the RZ bc they had a weak run game. 

Cedar hill wins this time around bc their run defense and OL run blocking has improved.

The game was 33-18 heading into the 4th quarter. Cedar Hill early in the 4th quarter gets to the DeSoto 3 yard line and comes up empty(How often does that happen?). They punch it in and it would've made the game a one score game.

When you have 3 RZ possessions in a game and you come up empty on all 3 possessions, and end up losing by 2 scores, the score is not indicative of what happened. 

[Horsefly]

2 hours ago, steeler01 said:

The game was 33-18 heading into the 4th quarter. Cedar Hill early in the 4th quarter gets to the DeSoto 3 yard line and comes up empty(How often does that happen?). They punch it in and it would've made the game a one score game.

When you have 3 RZ possessions in a game and you come up empty on all 3 possessions, and end up losing by 2 scores, the score is not indicative of what happened. 

The indictment against Chill early on was that they could not run the ball well.  Inside the RZ defense secondary was able to crowd inside n stuff the run and use the short field to guard vs the pass.  Chill tried unsuccessfully to run it inside the RZ and were stuffed a lot. Since then their run game has improved, I don't expect that to be a problem

[SOCIntellectualProperty]

Desoto improved as well... they were running only 3 offensive plays prior to the Cedar Hill Game

 

 

I expect them to dominate Cedar Hill the same way the did SLC

 

Abilene was a wakeup call ... and the worst thing that couldve happened to Cedar Hill

[Horsefly]

5 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Desoto improved as well... they were running only 3 offensive plays prior to the Cedar Hill Game

 

 

I expect them to dominate Cedar Hill the same way the did SLC

 

Abilene was a wakeup call ... and the worst thing that couldve happened to Cedar Hill

 I never bet against you SOC.  you've been spot on with your assessments before.  

[thc6795]

Desoto will roll Cedar Hill. 

[CHill]

8 hours ago, steeler01 said:

The game was 33-18 heading into the 4th quarter. Cedar Hill early in the 4th quarter gets to the DeSoto 3 yard line and comes up empty(How often does that happen?). They punch it in and it would've made the game a one score game.

When you have 3 RZ possessions in a game and you come up empty on all 3 possessions, and end up losing by 2 scores, the score is not indicative of what happened. 

Two unsportsmanlike penalties on non contact fouls (that never happens) and a holding call yielded a total of three points in those RZ possessions turn that game and using the wildcat running play that was dome from the start.  This game the wildcat formation has been scratch eight weeks ago and the addition of two junior speedster RBs and a healthy dual threat QB, I like their chances.